When former Vice President Dick Cheney endorsed my reelection campaign, he said that the War on Terror is more than a contest of arms and more than a test of will; it’s also a battle of ideas.
Mike Lee is on the wrong side of that battle.
After the Soviet Union left Afghanistan, the West essentially abandoned the country. Afghanistan became a failed state, allowing the tyrants of the Taliban to take over. They, in turn, invited al Qaeda in, resulting in the creation of the training camps that bred the terror and violence that culminated in the 9/11 attacks in America and in other nations that claimed thousands of lives.
We must learn from history to protect Americans from another attack.
In case there was any doubt in anyone’s mind, Mike Lee’s social media director, Connor Boyack, made Mike’s position crystal clear in a Facebook post written on March 22, 2010, at 1:51 PM when he wrote:
“[Mike Lee] does not support the war on terror.”
Mike Lee’s campaign sees this as a positive thing, but in my mind, it is irresponsible; indeed, unconscionable. I have been to Afghanistan and spoken directly to those who are prosecuting the war and also to the soldiers who are on the front lines of the battle. I know their commitment to freedom and security for this nation. They would be shocked to hear their mission described as nothing more than “delivering meals on wheels.”
The world changed on 9/11. Mike Lee, unfortunately, did not.
We simply cannot abandon our efforts in Afghanistan and in the larger War on Terror, nor can we entrust someone with high office who so flippantly dismisses a dangerous threat.






